BBajel ProjectsExecutive Cockpit

Order Book & Tendering 360

The front of the order book — bid & tender pipeline by stage, forecast vs plan, win/loss, and the deals that decide the quarter.

Bajel Projects Limited · FY26 (Mar'26, standalone audited anchor)
Bajaj Group's power-transmission & distribution EPC and tower/monopole manufacturing arm
1,400 employees · 1+ plants & units · 6 export markets
Executive read· the answer, then the moves

Q3 FY26 commit ₹400 Cr sits ₹34 Cr below the ₹434 Cr plan — ₹100 Cr of best-case upside must convert to make the number. The ₹15,000 Cr addressable bid pipeline gives ample forward coverage; the call is winnable but only if the at-risk upside is forced to close.

3 of 3 headline metrics improving vs prior · still off target: Order Inflow (FY) ₹3,250 Cr vs ₹3,600 Cr, Book-to-Bill 1.2x vs 1.2x, Order Book ₹4,055 Cr vs ₹4,500 Cr

Do now — ranked by urgency
  1. 1
    Convert ₹100 Cr of best-case upside to close the ₹34 Cr plan gapAct now
    Why it matters

    Commit ₹400 Cr is ₹34 Cr short of the ₹434 Cr Q3 FY26 plan — the gap that decides whether the quarter lands.

    What's driving it
    • Q3 FY26 commit ₹400 Cr vs ₹434 Cr plan
    • ₹100 Cr best-case upside above commit
    FYI
    • Pipeline ₹15,000 Cr (34.6x coverage), ₹5,680 Cr weighted
    • Owner: BD & Tendering
  2. 2
    ₹90 Cr of programs at risk — Q3 FY26Act now
    Why it matters

    Each lost order is confirmed order-book revenue visibility that won't repeat.

    What's driving it
    • renewal window Q3 FY26
    • Signal: Order-book risk
    FYI
    • Of ₹700 Cr of programs up for renewal in Q3 FY26, ₹90 Cr is at risk of non-repeat.
    • Owner: Head — Business Development & Tendering
  3. 3
    ₹120 Cr of programs at risk — Q4 FY26Act now
    Why it matters

    Each lost order is confirmed order-book revenue visibility that won't repeat.

    What's driving it
    • renewal window Q4 FY26
    • Signal: Order-book risk
    FYI
    • Of ₹1008 Cr of programs up for renewal in Q4 FY26, ₹120 Cr is at risk of non-repeat.
    • Owner: Head — Business Development & Tendering
  4. 4
    ₹80 Cr of programs at risk — Q1 FY27Act now
    Why it matters

    Each lost order is confirmed order-book revenue visibility that won't repeat.

    What's driving it
    • renewal window Q1 FY27
    • Signal: Order-book risk
    FYI
    • Of ₹570 Cr of programs up for renewal in Q1 FY27, ₹80 Cr is at risk of non-repeat.
    • Owner: Head — Business Development & Tendering
📈 Clients, PGCIL & internationalisationStep 1 of 6 · order book, TBCB tenders & forecastClients & Utilities 360All journeys
🌐 Enterprise 360 modules· on Order Book & Tendering 360Browse all 31 views ▾
● LiveBuilt forBD / Tendering VPs· coverage & forecast callBid / Sales Ops· stage velocity & hygieneCEO / Board· will we make the quarter

Bajel is pursuing ₹15,000 Cr of bid pipeline across the funnel (₹5,680 Cr weighted). This view answers the business-development chief's two questions — will we make the quarter (forecast vs plan) and why we win or lose — and points at the deals that move the number.

Data backing: pipeline_stage · forecast · winloss · opportunity · kpi
₹15,000 Cr
Bid pipeline
124 tenders
₹5,680 Cr
Weighted pipeline
value × win-prob
75%
₹-Win-rate
won ÷ (won+lost) ₹
₹3,250 Cr
Order inflow
book-to-bill 1.16x
₹4,055 Cr
Order book
confirmed, unexecuted
Coverage

Pipeline by stage

Value and win-probability rise toward the close — weighted value is what to bank on.

Qualify · 60 opps · 20% win₹7,000 Cr
Develop · 34 opps · 40% win₹4,000 Cr
Proposal · 20 opps · 60% win₹2,600 Cr
Negotiation · 10 opps · 80% win₹1,400 Cr

Dark fill = win-probability within each stage's value. Weighted pipeline totals ₹5,680 Cr.

The forecast call

Q3 FY26 — ₹400 Cr commit vs ₹434 Cr plan

Commit, best-case and closed-to-date against the plan line.

Q1 FY26 · actualclosed ₹660 Cr vs plan ₹650 Cr
Q2 FY26 · actualclosed ₹690 Cr vs plan ₹700 Cr
Q3 FY26 · currentcommit ₹400 Cr · best ₹500 Cr
Q4 FY26 · forecastcommit ₹900 Cr · best ₹1,100 Cr

Q3 FY26: commit ₹400 Cr is ₹34 Cr below the ₹434 Cr plan; ₹100 Cr of best-case upside must convert to close the gap. Black line = plan.

Why we win & lose

₹-win-rate 75% · ₹2,350 Cr won vs ₹790 Cr lost

Clone the win reasons into low-win families; attack the top loss reason first.

Why we win
765 kV / GIS credentials & PGCIL TBCB empanelment₹1,200 Cr · 22
Bajaj-Group backing & CRISIL A+ (bid capacity)₹700 Cr · 18
In-house fabrication & galvanizing (supply security)₹450 Cr · 30
Why we lose
Aggressive L1 pricing by larger peers (KEC / KPIL)₹380 Cr · 20
Scale / bid-capacity vs mega-EPC players₹260 Cr · 14
No HVDC capability (vs Skipper / KEC)₹150 Cr · 8

Read it: 765 kv / gis credentials & pgcil tbcb empanelment wins the most (₹1,200 Cr); Aggressive L1 pricing by larger peers (KEC / KPIL) is the top loss (₹380 Cr) — tighten discount discipline (see Order & Tender 360) before chasing new demand.

Move the number

Named deals in play

Signal-sourced deals convert higher — prioritize them.

OpportunityCustomerSolutionValueStageWin %Source
PGCIL 765 kV D/C TBCB line packagePower Grid Corp (PGCIL)Power Transmission (Lines & Substations ≤765 kV)₹450 CrDevelop55%signal
Egypt 500 kV OHTL — EETC (ultra-mega export)EETC (Egypt) / InternationalInternational EPC (MENA & Africa)₹400 CrProposal60%signal
Data-centre 400/220/33 kV GIS substationData-centre & new-segmentData-Centre GIS Substations₹300 CrDevelop55%signal
Adani 400 kV D/C line (private developer)Adani Energy SolutionsPower Transmission (Lines & Substations ≤765 kV)₹300 CrQualify45%signal
Pune 765 kV AIS substation + Karjat / Lonikand baysState utilities (MPPTCL·KPTCL·MSETCL·HVPNL…)765 kV AIS Substations₹250 CrProposal58%outbound
Bellary–Davanagere 400 kV RE-evacuationKPTCL & other STUsRE-Evacuation Lines₹220 CrQualify50%signal