BBajel ProjectsExecutive Cockpit

Quote-to-Cash 360

One spine from tender to cash — the value, the conversion, the days, and the leakage at every handoff. Where the bid pipeline & awarded orders turn into engineered, constructed, billed and collected cash (and where it gets stuck).

Bajel Projects Limited · FY26 (Mar'26, standalone audited anchor)
Bajaj Group's power-transmission & distribution EPC and tower/monopole manufacturing arm
1,400 employees · 1+ plants & units · 6 export markets
Executive read· the answer, then the moves

₹686 Cr is leaking or stuck across the 439-day quote-to-cash cycle — the largest single pool is ₹336 Cr at Collect. Close the billing lag and aged book to pull cash forward without selling a thing.

5 of 6 headline metrics improving vs prior · still off target: Revenue (FY26) ₹2,792 Cr vs ₹3,200 Cr, Debtor Days 214d vs 170d, Cash Conversion Cycle 74d vs 60d

Do now — ranked by urgency
  1. 1
    Working capital heavy — 214 debtor daysAct now
    Why it matters

    Tighten milestone billing & collections; target debtor days 214→170 to turn FCF positive.

    What's driving it
    • Debtor Days
    • Signal: Alert
    FYI

    Receivables ~₹1,636 Cr tie up 214 days; borrowings jumped ₹15→₹367 Cr to fund working capital.

  2. 2
    ₹90 Cr of programs at risk — Q3 FY26Act now
    Why it matters

    Each lost order is confirmed order-book revenue visibility that won't repeat.

    What's driving it
    • renewal window Q3 FY26
    • Signal: Order-book risk
    FYI
    • Of ₹700 Cr of programs up for renewal in Q3 FY26, ₹90 Cr is at risk of non-repeat.
    • Owner: Head — Business Development & Tendering
  3. 3
    ₹120 Cr of programs at risk — Q4 FY26Act now
    Why it matters

    Each lost order is confirmed order-book revenue visibility that won't repeat.

    What's driving it
    • renewal window Q4 FY26
    • Signal: Order-book risk
    FYI
    • Of ₹1008 Cr of programs up for renewal in Q4 FY26, ₹120 Cr is at risk of non-repeat.
    • Owner: Head — Business Development & Tendering
  4. 4
    ₹80 Cr of programs at risk — Q1 FY27Act now
    Why it matters

    Each lost order is confirmed order-book revenue visibility that won't repeat.

    What's driving it
    • renewal window Q1 FY27
    • Signal: Order-book risk
    FYI
    • Of ₹570 Cr of programs up for renewal in Q1 FY27, ₹80 Cr is at risk of non-repeat.
    • Owner: Head — Business Development & Tendering
📈 Clients, PGCIL & internationalisationStep 6 of 6 · watch it convert order → cashProject / Job 360Journey complete ✓All journeys
🌐 Enterprise 360 modules· on Order-to-Cash 360Browse all 31 views ▾
● LiveBuilt forCFO· cash conversion & working-capital tied upProject Execution· engineer → bill lag (unbilled progress / milestone certs)BD · Tendering· tender → order conversion & discount discipline

The tender-to-cash cycle, end to end. Addressable tenders become awarded orders, orders become engineered & procured scope, scope becomes constructed & erected work, work becomes a milestone invoice, and an invoice becomes cash — 439 days from tender to cash, with ₹686 Cr leaking or stuck across the handoffs. Each stage links to the 360 that owns it and the records to work. (PGCIL & long-cycle transmission contracts bill on a milestone cadence — this is the project-execution lane.)

Data backing: o2c_stage (cycle stages) · quote_system · pipeline · project · ar_invoice / ar_aging — composed from the underlying 360s
439d
Quote-to-cash time
quote → collected
₹686 Cr
Tied up in the cycle
leaking or stuck
76%
Collected of booked
rest in inventory / AR
22%
Tender → award
win-to-book
1.45
Book-to-bill
order book > revenue
The spine

Tender → Award → Engineer → Construct → Commission & Collect

Value flowing through each stage, the conversion from the prior stage, days in-stage, and the leakage at the handoff.

Quote45d
₹15,000 Cr
Tender / Bid
₹250 Cr leak
Order30d
₹3,250 Cr
Award (LoA / Order)
Deliver120d
₹2,900 Cr
Engineering & Procurement
₹60 Cr leak
Bill30d
₹2,792 Cr
Construction & Erection
₹40 Cr leak
Collect214d
₹2,456 Cr
Commissioning & Collection
₹336 Cr leak
Where the time goes

439-day tender-to-cash

The biggest levers are engineering & procurement (design + steel / material lead time) and collection (214 debtor days) — the award handoff is quick; the billing lag is the quiet one.

Quote 45d
30d
Deliver 120d
30d
Collect 214d
Quote · 45dOrder · 30dDeliver · 120dBill · 30dCollect · 214d
Where cash leaks or gets stuck

₹686 Cr across the cycle

Each leak quantified, owned, and linked to the 360 and the records that fix it — the working-capital recovery list.

📝 Quote₹250 Cr

Tenders lost to L1 pricing / bid-capacity vs mega-EPC peers

Owner: BD & TenderingWork it →
🏗️ Deliver₹60 Cr

Engineering rework + material (steel / zinc) lead-time slippage

Owner: Engineering · ProcurementWork it →
🔩 Bill₹40 Cr

Unbilled progress + milestone-certification lag

Owner: Project Execution · BillingWork it →▤ records
💵 Collect₹336 Cr

Aged receivables >60d — billed, not collected (214 debtor days)

Owner: Treasury · CollectionsWork it →▤ records

Read this: the two biggest pools are ₹336 Cr aged AR (collect) and ₹40 Cr unbilled progress / milestone-cert lag (bill) — both pure working capital. Closing the billing lag and the aged book pulls ~₹376 Cr of cash forward without selling a thing.

Every stage, one row

Stage detail

Value, conversion, days, leakage and owner — drill to the owning 360.

StageValueConv. from priorDays in-stageLeakageOwnerDrill
📝 Tender / Bid₹15,000 Cr45d₹250 CrBD & Tendering
📜 Award (LoA / Order)₹3,250 Cr22%30dBD · Contracts
🏗️ Engineering & Procurement₹2,900 Cr89%120d₹60 CrEngineering · Procurement
🔩 Construction & Erection₹2,792 Cr96%30d₹40 CrProject Execution · Billing
💵 Commissioning & Collection₹2,456 Cr88%214d₹336 CrTreasury · Collections